-
September 12th, 2009, 08:55 PM
#1
Inactive Member
PV question
I noticed Pinkston did not play very much if at all in the 4th the other night. What is the story behind that move? Also what was with them switching to the I exclusively the other night instead of the spread offense that they had run the previous two weeks? Is that a permanent move or what? Anyone know?
-
September 13th, 2009, 08:20 AM
#2
Inactive Member
Re: PV question
The point is that it worked better than the spread. About the Pinkston kid, don't know about him.
-
September 13th, 2009, 09:14 AM
#3
Inactive Member
Re: PV question
The spread may be the way to go for this week's game though.
-
September 13th, 2009, 09:14 AM
#4
Inactive Member
Re: PV question
No doubt that it worked well. Just was wondering if it was a permanent move or if they intend on jumping back and forth between two distinctly different offenses. Just seems to me that it would be hard to get adequate practice time for each one during the week at a school that size where there are a few kids playing both ways. #33 did a great job running the ball. He hits the hole hard. I just wondered if Pinkston was injured or something.
-
September 14th, 2009, 12:11 AM
#5
Inactive Member
Re: PV question
I heard he hurt his collarbone
-
September 14th, 2009, 08:20 AM
#6
Inactive Member
-
September 15th, 2009, 01:29 PM
#7
Inactive Member
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks